“Neighborhoods built up all at once change little physically over the years as a rule...[Residents] regret that the neighborhood has changed. Yet the fact is, physically it has changed remarkably little. People's feelings about it, rather, have changed. The neighborhood shows a strange inability to update itself, enliven itself, repair itself, or to be sought after, out of choice, by a new generation. It is dead. Actually it was dead from birth, but nobody noticed this much until the corpse began to smell.” ― Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities.
But perhaps my vision is tainted by experiences outside the city, and a knowledge of everything else that is beautiful that I have encountered in recent endeavors, making what was then an exciting, liberating area, now one of hopelessness and unease.
Image taken from http://media-cache-ec3.pinterest.com/192x/38/5b/6b/385b6bd9af420d6035251e4f2456cf3f.jpg
Corrupted by idealized notions of order planted into development schemes of the suburbs I now inhabit, it is only natural that the dissimilar feels unnatural.
However, it was this image (below) of children and adults playing cricket in the street between apartment buildings in a disreputable area which had me questioning the real source of my apprehension toward the neighborhood. Such socialization and friendship among the members of this community is something to be admired as few neighborhoods are able to boast of such interaction.
Hall and Barrett (2012) mention that a lack of social cohesion within communities are a major source of social and cultural problems in urban areas. Then, if that sort of issue is ruled out from affecting this neighborhood, why the stereotypical conception?
Urban models have the tendency to suggest that some areas are 'better' than others, e.g. that all housing in inner city areas is low class/low-income and that only the elderly and single-parent families live here in a zone lacking open space, whereas wealthy families only reside in the 'tree-lined' suburbs or gated communities.
Image taken from http://www.glogster.com/lovbug34/stop-stereotypes-reblog-this-glog-if-you-support-me-/g-6lpgc34qj68310st7g144qp
It is easy to accept stereotypes without realizing we are doing so, and seeing a situation for ourselves may lead us to question our original picture.




I love your style of writing here. It seems very emotional and real. I was eager for so much more. I really enjoyed this read and it really does make you wonder as to how easily we accept stereotypes. We know never to judge a book by it cover but somehow we can't, as a society, seem to put that into practice. Very thought provoking.
ReplyDeleteOh My ---- I want to hear MORE from you -- tell us MORE!! Talk to us about liveability, Jane Jacobs, "community" and "culture" -- residential segregation, race etc etc... . I love this quote from your post:
ReplyDelete"Urban models have the tendency to suggest that some areas are 'better' than others, e.g. that all housing in inner city areas is low class/low-income and that only the elderly and single-parent families live here in a zone lacking open space, whereas wealthy families only reside in the 'tree-lined' suburbs or gated communities." -- but I want to hear -- even if it's true that single parent families and elderly live here, what does that mean for the perception of "better" neighbourhoods.
AND I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS PHOTO!!